|
   
Justin F. Fraser, MD, Ron Von Jako, MD, John A. Carrino, MD, MPH, and Roger Härtl, MD
 |
BACKGROUND
This cadaveric study compared efficacy and safety of an
electromagnetic (EM) guidance system versus conventional
fluoroscopy for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. As
percutaneous pedicle screw fixation becomes increasingly
common in spinal surgery, intraoperative imaging systems that
maximize efficiency while minimizing radiation exposure and
inaccurate trajectories will be progressively more important.
Published studies have validated the safety of percutaneous
screw fixation using conventional fluoroscopic guidance and
frameless optical stereotaxy, though EM guidance systems
have not been evaluated for percutaneous placement in the
lumbosacral spine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the
clinical applicability of an EM system for minimally invasive
spine fusion in the lumbosacral spine.
METHODS
Five human cadaveric specimens underwent bilateral
lumbosacral percutaneous screw fixation from L1 to S1 using
conventional anteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic
techniques on one side and 2-dimesional (2D) EM guidance
on each matching side. Intraoperative efficiency was evaluated,
and pedicle, vertebral, and critical breach rates were assessed
on postoperative computed tomography (CT).
 |
RESULTS
Overall mean fluoroscopy time per screw was 58.9 ± 44.7 seconds
for conventional fluoroscopy compared to 27.4 ± 13.5 seconds
for electromagnetic guidance (P = .0003). Pedicle, vertebral, and
critical breach rates for the L1-S1 were 32.1%, 10.7%, and 25.0%
for conventional fluoroscopy and 42.8%, 10.7%, and 14.1% for
electromagnetic guidance (difference not statistically significant
[ns]). In comparing critical breaches in the lumbar spine (L1-L5),
there was a significant difference between 2-D EM guidance (0)
and CF guidance (6) (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS
Two-dimensional EM navigation provides a modality for
lumbosacral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation that is
more efficient and safer than conventional fluoroscopy. This
data provides a foundation for further clinical trials of this
technology.
Level of Evidence
Level 5 – Bench Research

Key Words
Minimally invasive spine fusion, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, electromagnetic guidance. SAS Journal. Winter 2008;2:43–47. DOI: SASJ-2007-0105-RR
|
|
Justin F. Fraser, MD, Ron Von Jako, MD, John A. Carrino, MD, MPH, and Roger Härtl, MD
From Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University,
New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (Fraser and Härtl); Surgical Development
Leader, GE Healthcare Surgery (Von Jako); and Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology,
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Carrino)
Ron Von Jako, MD, is an employee and shareholder in GE Healthcare Surgery. Cadaveric
specimens were provided by GE Healthcare Surgery. Drs. Fraser, Carrino, and Härtl
are not paid employees and do not receive personal stipends from GE Healthcare
Surgery.
Address correspondence to Roger Härtl, MD, Department of Neurological Surgery,
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525
E. 68th St., Box 99, New York, NY 10021, (email: roger@hartlmd.net)
This manuscript was submitted June 17, 2007, and accepted for publication November
20, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Top of Page
|
  |
|
|